It is not the question of getting more marks.
The original mail on the topic sought UGC circular for relaxation of five 
percent for admission to M.A. M.PHIL. etc. as is given in NET.
Suppose, minimum qualifying for applying for NET is 55%,  then VI are entitled 
to apply for it even though he has scored fifty percent marks.
Same relaxation is sought for minimum qualifying marks for admission to PG 
courses etc.
I believe it is justified, even though I don't know of any circular to that 
effect.
It is different, say, from awarding marks for sports activities, etc.
Actually, qualifying standards may be relaxed for disabled aspirants for rare 
goods of life, like higher education, scholarships, etc. so that they may take 
advantage of them and move towards meeting standards of public at large.
Our constitution mentions compromising with efficiency for accommodating claims 
of scheduled castes and tribes.
It is meant to make good a social disability arising out of past discrimination.
So, heaven is not going to fall if persons with disabilities are given the 
benefit of goodies of life by slightly relaxing qualifying standards.
If I accept the logic of too many concessions, then:
 why reservations in jobs?
Why land at preferential rates?
Why concessions in public transport?
Why the demand for subsidy on assistive technology?
Why concession in income tax?
Why after all, an unrelated person should be expected to lead us by hand, or 
even show the way sometimes?
Too many concessions?
Is deprivation of a sense completely or partially such a light occurrence that 
society should begrudge us a few benefits of life out of public resources, at 
least?
Yes, we should live like a able-bodied person, but remember, we are not 
able-bodied, and even if we are grandiose enough to think we are sometimes, no 
uninterested observer is going to accede to our view.
Subjective reality may be anything, however, objective reality is that if a 
person is blind, he is blind, come what may.

Regards


Rajesh Asudani

Assistant General Manager (PPS),
Reserve Bank of India
Nagpur
09420397185
O: 0712 2806676
Res: 0712 2591349
Doth God exact day-labour, light denied?"
John Milton


-----Original Message-----
From: accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in 
[mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Subramani L
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 4:46 PM
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Subject: Re: [AI] UGC circular for 5% mark's relaxation?

Of course, I do agree with the reasoning -- that people who use scribes
do lose marks (don't worry, I have lost the whole exam), that other
category candidates do get extra marks and it doesn't make a difference
in the knowledge levels. But my question is, if you were to mention mark
concession to someone, don't you think there is a possibility that we
(as a community) will be facing the accusation that we ask for too many
cconcessions? When people don't consider giving us the chance to write
exams using computers, which, in my opinion, is a pretty basic thing,
then where is the question of giving more marks, especially if it means
you are going to gain advantage over someone else. In my opinion, this
doesn't rank amongst the most necessary of concessions which must be
attained at any cost to gain parity with others.

Subramani

-----Original Message-----
From: accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in
[mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Srinivasu
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:45 AM
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Subject: Re: [AI] UGC circular for 5% mark's relaxation?

Hi Rajesh,
Agreed. I actually meant there should no such rule. Sorry about
confusion.
Also, will agree with you on your other email that such relaxation
should be
provided to people who suffer from severe disabilities or may be someone
like who is pretty slow learner.

-----Original Message-----
From: accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in
[mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Asudani,
Rajesh
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:23 AM
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Subject: Re: [AI] UGC circular for 5% mark's relaxation?

Well, please don't say that "I don't think such rules should get
implemented".
Either there should be no such rule, or if it is there, it has to be
implemented.
Please take clear stand, because saying that such rules should not be
implemented, and such rules should be implemented, goes against the
spirit
of rule of law.
If law is there, it is for implementation, otherwise, do dispense with
it.

We can oppose the rule or law itself, but we cannot say that even if is
on
the statute book but it should not be implemented.

Regards

Rajesh Asudani

Assistant General Manager (PPS),
Reserve Bank of India
Nagpur
09420397185
O: 0712 2806676
Res: 0712 2591349
Doth God exact day-labour, light denied?"
John Milton


-----Original Message-----
From: accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in
[mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Srinivasu
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 6:20 PM
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Subject: Re: [AI] UGC circular for 5% mark's relaxation?

Hi all,
@ Satguru, Sorry, I don't have answer to your question.

Secondly, should we encourage such circulars? While we are demanding for
inclusive world in one hand, why should we expect such relaxations
rather
than competing with regular world? I personal, don't think such rules
should
get implemented.

Thanks,
Srinivasu

-----Original Message-----
From: accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in
[mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Satguru
Rathi
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 5:40 PM
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Subject: [AI] UGC circular for 5% mark's relaxation?

Hi all,

Greetings!

I am looking for UGC circular which talks about 5% relaxation in marks
while
taking admission in M.A or other cources. Please note that the UGC
document
which respected Devnandan sir had sent to us does not contain that
circular.
It only contains circular for relaxation of 5% marks in NET exams. I
also
did  a search on the UGC website but invain.
I am in urgent need of that circular.

Looking for an earliest response from you.

Thanks in advance.

___
"Life's battle  do not always go, To the stronger or faster man. But
sooner
or later the one who wins, Is the one who thinks he Can".

Satguru.

Emails:
satgurura...@yahoo.co.in;best_mu...@rediffmail.com;tarannumra...@gmail.c
om
Skype: satgururathi
Mob: +9199 71 23 16 27


To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with
the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
please
visit the list home page at

http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.i
n




To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with
the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
please
visit the list home page at

http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.i
n

Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination,
use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained
in
this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you
have received this email by error,  please notify us by return e-mail or
telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any
attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments
for
the presence of viruses. The Bank accepts no liability for any damage
caused
by any virus transmitted by this email.



To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with
the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
please
visit the list home page at

http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.i
n




To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
please visit the list home page at

http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.i
n

Email secured by TPML Raksha Checkpoint



To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with 
the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this 
e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email by error,  please notify us by return e-mail or telephone 
and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The Bank accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email.



To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with 
the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to