'We need cost-effective, wide-reaching innovations' 

Interview with S.S. Badrinath, founder and Chairman Emeritus, Sankara 
Nethralaya. 
- Photo: V. Ganesan 
 
S.S. Badrinath:"The medical profession's priority should be Indian citizens and 
only thereafter, outsiders from other countries." 

An ophthalmologist for nearly four decades, S.S. Badrinath has been a constant 
figure in the dramatic evolution of the specialty in India over the years.
In an interview with Ramya Kannan on World Sight Day (October 14) Dr. Badrinath 
says that key to his practice, and the philosophy of his institution, is
the conviction that ophthalmic services must be available, affordable, 
accessible and accountable. He also believes that Ophthalmology is a growing 
science,
and that as it grows, it must take into account other sciences to provide 
speedier service to the people.

The National Blindness Control Programme is touted as one of the most 
successful national health schemes rolled out by the government. Is this 
justified?
What are the factors that enabled this?

We were the first nation to have a national programme for blindness control. 
Since 1955 to the present day, we have reduced the blindness rate from 1.7
to 0.8. In the1950s, 85 per cent of the blindness in India was due to cataract, 
but it has now come down to over 50 per cent. That is a significant reduction.
The government is also doing a lot of work on refractive errors, childhood 
blindness, and Diabetic Retinopathy now. NGOs have also played an important
role in the prevention of blindness.

The success of the NBCP lies in the fact that the results are immediate. Word 
of mouth transmission of information that treatment is available and produces
good results within a short period of time brings patients in. Also, cataract 
surgery can be done by people who have had good experience in cataract surgery
and such people are available in India. I think the NBCP was very well-planned.

Is the health administration in tune with evolving issues in Ophthalmology? 
What is the path for the future?

We need to spend our money on diseases that affect a large number of people. 
How much money, how to allocate those funds, how many people should be targeted
and where to focus on, are questions that require good planning. Unless an 
epidemiological study is done, disease prevention and control are not possible.
Unfortunately, we have no definite, well-planned and executed epidemiological 
study in the area except one from the LV Prasad Eye Institute that was done
eight years ago. At Nethralaya, we have now embarked on epidemiological 
research on two important areas - diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma.

I strongly feel that whatever innovations need to be done, have to be done with 
available resources. We need to find new methods, new innovations, and these
innovations must be cost-effective. The results of the innovation must bring 
solace to a large number and must facilitate better outcome/results on 
application.
We should also be able to reduce morbidity to the least as the result of this. 
Of course, this is possible only with research - a very important factor
in the medical field.

Many benefits accrue from research - for example, in Sankara Nethralaya we 
found that in congenital cataract Rubella was the causative factor. Preventing
Rubella infections in the mother is therefore the best way of preventing 
congenital cataracts. There is also a very interesting project where S. 
Ramakrishnan,
former director of biochemistry at SN found that amino acids taken orally is 
likely to prevent end-stage complications in diabetes mellitus - retinopathy,
nephropathy, neuropathy and cataracts.

The urban-rural divide in terms of availability of healthcare and shortage of 
professionals and infrastructure to tend to patients are issues that are 
agitating
planners and health administrators. Are there solutions in Ophthalmology?

In the rural areas, the availability of healthcare is very minimal, if anything 
exists at all. I would like to make tertiary healthcare available at doorsteps
in rural areas. There is indeed a scarcity of ophthalmologists; and efforts 
must be taken to make the manpower available. But until then, the specialty
must absorb advances in other aspects of science - for instance, Information 
Technology. Telemedicine, which uses, ICT, is currently the best way of 
approaching
the problem. We have had good experience in the last 8-10 years with 
tele-ophthalmology. Thanks to this, distance is no longer a consideration and 
the
patient can have a comprehensive examination by the best of specialists without 
travelling far. We believe that the urban-rural divide can be overcome
in the next 20-30 years, but only through tele-ophthalmology and tele-medicine 
programmes.

The costs incurred on medical treatment are increasing. India being a nation 
where the majority of the spending for health is out-of-pocket expenditure
by the patient and family, are there financing options? Insurance, for 
instance, or subsidies by the state/hospitals.

We tried to work out an insurance package specifically for the eyes. 
Unfortunately the premiums were too high. The State government's Chief 
Minister's Insurance
Scheme (Kalaignar Kaapeetu Thittam) is a good scheme. Under this, 16 eye 
conditions have been identified and expenses from Rs.6,500- Rs.7,000 are 
covered.

As for subsidies from institutions, the Sankara Nethralaya model itself is 
about making medical care affordable for the middle class in India and for the
very poor.

Almost 38 per cent of our patients are treated totally free of cost and the 
remaining pay a nominal fee - just a little more than what it costs us to 
provide
the service. The non-paying group receives quality care in no way different 
from the people who pay. Since we are a not-for-profit institution, any profit
that accrues is ploughed back in, to finance education initiatives, and 
research.

If stem cell research has progressed significantly to therapeutics at all in 
any segment of medicine, it is in ophthalmology.

That is right, in Ophthalmology we have been users of stem cell therapy in a 
large number of areas especially for the front part of the eye - the cornea.
For instance, when affected by acid or alkalis, a simple corneal transplant 
fails. However, when you do it with stem cells in the limbal area, it seems
to work. There are also applications in retinal pigment epithelial transplant - 
this will be helpful in the future to treat diseases of retinal degeneration.
We are also working, in our lab, on developing a synthetic cornea. Stem cell 
therapy has great potential, undoubtedly.

Your thoughts on medical tourism.

We have a large number of people living in India who require medical care and 
they need the attention of doctors who are already, in terms of numbers, 
insufficient,
here in India. Instead of treating our own patients, why do we think about 
treating people from outside the country? The medical profession's priority
should be Indian citizens and only thereafter, outsiders from other countries.

Ophthalmology wrote the opening paragraph of the organ donation movement. Is 
organ donation all set to grow?

The organ donation movement has picked up enormously in the last couple of 
decades. Essentially, it was the lack of knowledge on the part of the public
that eyes of the dead person could be used to restore eyesight of a blind 
person that prevented them from donating. However, once that idea was taken to
the people, eye donation became quite popular. I don't think, fundamentally, 
that there is any religious inhibition on the part of the people to donate
eyes. All religions in India encourage eye donation.



http://www.hindu.com/2010/10/14/stories/2010101464181300.htm


There is enough light for one who wants to see.
Easy tips of improving English at
http://shadablucknow.blogspot.com/ 
My contributions to the press
http://shadablucknow.blogspot.com/2008/10/my-contributions-to-press.html#link 
Many posts on one page
http://shadablucknow.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2008-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=47
  
To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with 
the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to