online.wsj.com

Advocates for Blind, Deaf Say Netflix, Target Are Legally Obligated to
Make Sites Easier to Navigate .

By JOE PALAZZOLO

Stephen Voss for The Wall Street Journal

Anne Taylor uses a Google Nexus 7 tablet at the National Federation of
the Blind in Baltimore.

.Commerce has moved online. Now, the disability lawsuits are following.

Advocates for disabled Americans have declared that companies have a
legal obligation to make their websites as accessible as their stores,
and they've filed suits across the country to force them to install
the digital version of wheelchair ramps and self-opening doors.

Their theory that the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act applies to
the modern Internet has been dismissed by several courts. Still, the
National Federation of the Blind and the National Association of the
Deaf have won legal victories against companies such as Target Corp.

Both companies settled the cases after federal judges rejected
arguments that their websites were beyond the scope of the ADA.

"It's what I call 'eat your spinach' litigation," said Daniel F.
Goldstein, a Baltimore lawyer who represents the NFB. "The market
share you gain is more than the costs of making your site accessible."

How the Blind Use Today's Technology
Learn about the tools available to help visually impaired people use
some everyday devices.

.Several other companies have worked with the NFB to make their
websites more accessible to people with disabilities, including eBay
Inc., EBAY +0.48%Monster.com, Travelocity and Ticketmaster.

Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law,
said most courts have ruled that online spaces aren't covered by the
ADA. "Congress never contemplated the Internet at the time, and if
they had, they would have included it," he said.

But that could soon change. The U.S. Department of Justice is expected
to issue new regulations on website accessibility later this year that
could take a broad view of the ADA's jurisdiction over websites. A
Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment.

That could mean websites will be required to include spoken
descriptions of photos and text boxes for the blind, as well as
captions and transcriptions of multimedia features for the deaf, said
Jared Smith, associate director of WebAIM, a nonprofit group that
trains and evaluates companies on Web accessibility.

Mr. Smith also advises companies to ensure that people with motor
disabilities can navigate websites without the use of a mouse, and to
use plain language and a strong design to aid people with cognitive or
intellectual disabilities.

Lawyers who represent companies in ADA cases say an expansive reading
of the law could expose their clients to a rash of frivolous lawsuits.
They also argue that companies face a considerable burden in ensuring
their websites are compatible with the latest technologies for aiding
the disabled, such as software that reads aloud text on the screen.

"It's in everybody's interest to make sure that disabled people have
access to websites, but whether the law is the avenue to achieve that
change is another question," said Matthew Kreeger, who represented
Target. "It's kind of a blunt instrument."

Not for Anne Taylor, who has to guess where to type in her name,
credit card information and address when she shops online on websites
that aren't accessible to the blind. She gets some help from the
computer voice that alerts her when she runs her mouse cursor across a
"text box."

Ms. Taylor, the director of access technologies at the NFB, which
represents an estimated 25 million adults with vision loss, said she
can usually figure out which bit of her personal information goes into
which box, given her area of expertise.

"But this isn't the experience we want blind people to have," she
said. "This is not an experience a company would want a sighted person
to have."

Research has exposed vast gaps in accessibility. Jonathan Lazar, a
professor at Towson University, studied 16 employment websites in 2012
and found that applicants who were blind required assistance more than
two-thirds of the time.

The costs of making a website accessible vary based on the complexity
of a website, and it is much cheaper to build accessibility features
into a new site than to retrofit an old one, experts said.

Tim Springer, chief executive of SSB BART Group, which advises
companies on accessibility, said companies can expect to pay about 10%
of their total website costs on retrofitting. But if they phase in
accessibility as they naturally upgrade their website, they usually
spend much less—between 1% and 3%, he said.

The ADA requires equal access to "public accommodations," which
include restaurants, retail stores, movie theaters, recreational
facilities and other physical spaces that are spelled out by the law.
It makes no mention of websites as a public accommodation.

Enlarge Image

CloseStephen Voss for The Wall Street Journal

The Focus 14 Blue device, right, connects with an iPad via Bluetooth
and has a refreshable Braille display.
.Some courts have held that ADA covers only physical spaces. The
Target case, which settled in 2008, marked the first time a federal
district judge ruled that the law applies to websites when they act as
a gateway to a brick-and-mortar store. As part of the settlement,
Target established a $6 million fund for settlement claims and agreed
to modify its website to meet accessibility guidelines. Target
declined to comment.

Last June, a federal district judge in Massachusetts became the first
to rule that the ADA's accessibility requirements apply to
website-only businesses. The case involved a suit brought by the
National Association of the Deaf against Netflix. It demanded the
company provide closed captioning for its Internet video subscribers.

"The fact that the ADA does not include Web-based services as a
specific example of a public accommodation is irrelevant," wrote Judge
Michael Ponsor. The legislative history of the ADA, he wrote, made it
clear that Congress intended the law to adapt to technology.

After the ruling, Netflix agreed to make 100% of its content captioned
by 2014. The company declined to comment.

Howard A. Rosenblum, CEO of the National Association of the Deaf, said
his group was in discussions with other companies about captioning
streaming movies online. "Legal action will be taken where such
discussions are not successful," Mr. Rosenblum wrote in an email.

Most cases are resolved without litigation, said Lainey Feingold, a
California lawyer who specializes in Web accessibility.

She has reached 45 agreements in the past 18 years with companies
ranging from Bank of America Corp. BAC +0.24%to Charles Schwab SCHW
+0.63%. She credited the financial industry, in particular, for its
efforts to improve website accessibility.

Robert Fine, a Miami-based lawyer who represents companies in ADA
matters, said clients are increasingly seeking counsel on website
accessibility before they are approached by lawyers such as Ms.
Feingold, because they want to avoid bad publicity and increase their
market share.

"My clients tend not to be saying 'How do I get out of doing this,' " he said.

Write to Joe Palazzolo at [email protected]

A version of this article appeared March 22, 2013, on page B1 in the
U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Disabled
Sue Over Web Shopping.

Copyright 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution
and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and
by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies,
please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
www.djreprints.com

Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to