Hi Mohib, If an entire article is not displayed on one page, why don't you type single page in edit box. Or when you hear, contd just do down arrow you will find Facebook Frame there link single page is given. Hope this helps.
On 7/3/13, ashook kumaaaaar <[email protected]> wrote: > tell me please sir what was the write answer of 1st question > of paper 1 > > On 7/3/13, Shireen Irani <[email protected]> wrote: >> thanx a lot for posting this. i have always been disgusted with the >> question framing practices for the net exam, and this really takes the >> cake. truely shameful for academitians to do this for such a >> prestigious exam. >> thank god i am free from giving it. >> >> On 7/3/13, avinash shahi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Many of us appeared for NET held on Sunday gone by. >>> Now as we felt shocked at many questions during the exam, our views >>> has been echoed in an editorial in The Indian Express. >>> Hope better sense prevail among question-papers preparers next time. >>> http://www.indianexpress.com/news/epic-fail/1136803/0 >>> The UGC's test for entry-level university teachers reveals sexist and >>> condescending assumptions >>> >>> The University Grants Commission has made some outrageous errors of >>> judgement in framing its examination for teacher aptitude in the >>> National Eligibility Test (NET). One of the multiple choice questions >>> asked: "At the primary school stage, most teachers should be women >>> because". This is a patently disputable assumption, and the choices >>> provided were all problematic, steeped in sexist stereotypes. The idea >>> that women teach children better than men is probably drawn from the >>> observation that, in many homes, it is a woman's responsibility to >>> provide early nurturing, to teach a child how to learn, and introduce >>> elementary ideas. This is not because women are especially talented at >>> it, but because men seldom take it up with enthusiasm. That women >>> "know basic content better than men" is equally condescending. The >>> unspoken extension would be, women teach children better with basics, >>> so that men can take over at the higher, more evolved levels? Another >>> choice, "can deal with children with love and affection", is also >>> about freezing gender roles, where women share and care and love, >>> while men compete and prod each other to greater achievement. It is a >>> crass reduction of human personality into two types. The most >>> appalling suggestion, of course, was that women make better primary >>> school teachers because they "are available on lower salaries". Even >>> if it was the wrong answer, it is incredible that it was even >>> articulated as an option by the body that regulates and oversees >>> higher education in India. >>> >>> The NET was devised as an attempt to standardise measures of quality >>> for entry-level teaching staff. It is no surprise that this aim has >>> been undercut — the aptitude test speaks for itself. The questions are >>> clearly open to subjective interpretation. Several of the answer >>> options provided could be credibly argued in an essay, but they may or >>> may not be what the test-setters had in mind. Some of the analogies >>> are bewildering — for instance, "bee-honey, cow-milk, teacher-?" The >>> options are: intelligence, marks, lessons, wisdom. The test reflects >>> the unexamined prejudices of those who drafted it. >>> >>> These bloopers are particularly egregious because they come from such >>> a powerful source. As a regulator of higher education, the UGC has >>> given itself the mandate to control curricula, to manage appointments, >>> to direct the flow of funds. It is alarming that this kind of dotty >>> thinking and illogic can pass among those who confidently dictate to >>> universities. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Avinash Shahi >>> MPhil Research Scholar >>> Centre for the Study of Law and Governance >>> Jawaharlal Nehru University >>> New Delhi India >>> >>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >>> of >>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >>> Search for old postings at: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>> [email protected] >>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>> >>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>> please >>> visit the list home page at >>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >>> Disclaimer: >>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >>> the >>> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; >>> >>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the >>> mails >>> sent through this mailing list.. >>> >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >> of >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> [email protected] >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Disclaimer: >> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >> the >> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; >> >> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the >> mails >> sent through this mailing list.. >> > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > -- Avinash Shahi MPhil Research Scholar Centre for the Study of Law and Governance Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi India Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
