Shri S. K. Rungta is someone who has been involved in disability activism from the 1970s at least, that is before many of us were even born. He has done a lot of work for the community, including some important and famous judicial victories and very recently, leaking the obnoxious secret dossier of the government. Mr. Rungta was not the only leader of the community who was against passing the bill in its present version. The concerns expressed were legitimate. So there is no point attacking him in person. There may be differences of opinion with his perspective, but the decades of activism certainly deserve respect. That brings me to Shri Javed Abidi. He too has done significant work for the community, has worked to bring together different sections of the community and has his fair share of achievements. He had his own logic for demanding the passing of the bill in the present format with certain amendments. But it is just that many of us were not convinced with that. As a proclaimed cross disability activist, I doubt whether Shri Abidi correctly gaged the extend of concern that this bill generated among certain sections of the disabled. A cross disability platform, as he should know very well, is about building alliances where different concerns are understood and accommodated. This session being the last of this Lok Sabha, and with the kind of concerns that the bill gave way to along with the very suspect actions of the government, resulted in a lot of emotionalism in disability movement in recent times, mistakes may have been committed from different sides. But now that the bill is refered to the standing committee, we have to get over this face of emotionalism and come together so that we can have a meaningful and substantive legislation. I would urge shri Abidi to forget the bitterness if any and get back to the coalition building mode that would include everyone. The language of sarcasm and challenge may not be the best way to do it I believe. As for many of our Access India community members, the feeling that our legitimate concerns were getting ignored resulted not just in solid and strong face of activism, it also has given rise to a lot of emotional reactions. But now its time we think of the broader scenario. There is a war to be won out there. We can't have pitched battles and friendly firing inside our own camp. There was a genuine difference of opinion and approach with Mr Abidi and certain others. That difference has been expressed, there is no need to get so intensely and rather viciously personal. Lets have a civilized engagement from both sides.
On 2/25/14, Kanchan Pamnani <[email protected]> wrote: > I think its time that Nileema you and I must chat personally since we are > both in Mumbai. You are not aware of the reality of a lot of the situations > > that have occured in the last 10 years. Kanchan Pamnani > Advocate & Solicitor > 9, Suleman Chambers, > Battery Street, Colaba, > Mumbai - 400 039. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Neelima Surve" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 11:16 AM > Subject: Re: [AI] Kindly answer for this > > >>I am absolutely agreed with Mr. Bhavani Shankar Sir. >> >> &, NFB only can do it. & doing also since 3 or 4 dicades. &, >> therefore, I thought, he should not put, the sarcastic remark for Mr. >> Rungtha which he puts. >> >> -- >> God examine those whom loves he the most. >> >> >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of >> >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> [email protected] >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Disclaimer: >> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >> the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its >> veracity; >> >> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails >> >> sent through this mailing list.. >> > > > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > -- Mahesh S. Panicker Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Lady Shri Ram College, Lajpat Nagar New Delhi 110024 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
