dear avinash do let us know what radio udaan can do in it. we are ready for any assistance.
On 6/29/15, avinash shahi <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for your suggestions. > We know on what grounds to approach to the court. They have not > complied by the Office Memorandum of the Government of India. They > didn't ensure any compensation to those whose paper became nightmare > due to the scribe. Please see Ritesh Tomar's post on FB his scribe > provided by the school ruined his paper. Will the UGC and the CBSE own > any accountability? why we were asked to take writer's permission days > prior to the exam? who will compensate if a blind visits centre > multiple times unlike non-blind candidates? We have many more solid > grounds. I'm hopeful that the Judiciary will entertain our plee. > Friends do share your experiences of UGC/CBSE NET. We want people to > volunteer in gathering responses from those who don't use internet > frequently in different cities. Anybody? please? > On 6/29/15, Mohib Anwar Rafay <[email protected]> wrote: >> What were the terms of varrification of the scribe? >> Yes, the complaint may be made to UGC/HRD, but don't waste your >> precious time and money going to the court. Judiciary is almost >> corrupt and don't pay any serious attention to such matters. >> >> On 6/29/15, avinash shahi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm reproducing my FB post and solicit members responses who appeared >>> for the exam >>> >>> >>> Let me share my experience with you all,others do share we will write >>> collectively to the CBSE/UGC/HRD Ministry. friends from the media >>> fraternity are humbly requested to cover widely. >>> >>> 1. The UGC and the CBSE have outrightly overlooked the writer >>> guidelines issued by the government of India for conducting exams for >>> persons with disabilities. Instead of verifying candidate-own scribe’s >>> document on the date of examination, The CBSE imposed extra burden and >>> asked blind candidates’ to take permission one day prior to the exam. >>> Now one could easily apply one’s common sense to comprehend the >>> discrimination. When the all non-disabled aspirants were busy doing >>> last-minute preparation, blind candidates struggled from pillar to >>> post in reaching the different centres for availing permission to use >>> writers. Most of them who are very poor, were forced to incur extra >>> money unnecessairily Courtesy the CBSE. >>> 2. My examination centre was in Bosco Public School Pashchim Vihar >>> Delhi. And to my disappointment, CBSE officials didn’t give writer-fee >>> to my scribe. They contended that the CBSE would only provide writer >>> fee to those scribes who were arranged by the schools. I argued that >>> when authorities had verified the documents provided by my scribe and >>> he fulfilled the criteria recquired for writing the exam; why this >>> different treatment meted to him? The CBSE representative again >>> telephoned to the head office and was informed that the CBSE >>> formulated the policy where scribes braught by the candidates would be >>> provided no remuneration. I ask why this discrimination? If need >>> arises I’m determined to go to the Court against the UGC and the CBSE. >>> We’ve faced enough humiliation. Its no more be tolerated. I urge other >>> candidates to share their experiences,we will collate, compile, then >>> correspond with the UGC, CBSE and the HRD Ministry. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Avinash Shahi >>> Doctoral student at Centre for Law and Governance JNU >>> >>> >>> >>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >>> of >>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >>> Search for old postings at: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>> [email protected] >>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>> >>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>> please >>> visit the list home page at >>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >>> Disclaimer: >>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >>> the >>> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; >>> >>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the >>> mails >>> sent through this mailing list.. >>> >> >> >> -- >> Mohib Anwar Rafay >> >> Phone: +919 555 555 765 >> >> >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> [email protected] >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Disclaimer: >> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >> the >> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; >> >> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails >> sent through this mailing list.. >> > > > -- > Avinash Shahi > Doctoral student at Centre for Law and Governance JNU > > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
