With a little more research, it looks like the git mirror gives us the best of both worlds anyway. Therefore, I declare this question moot.
Cheers, Adam On Sep 16, 2011 8:49 PM, "Benson Margulies" <[email protected]> wrote: > The project must use Apache svn as the definitive repository if you > want to be at Apache. You get a git mirror, and some day there's a > plot to allow full git, but some day is not today. > > Github as a primary reference is right out. > > Many of us make good use of git-svn at this point, infrastructure > provides git repos to clone that are already tuned for that. > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Jesse Yates <[email protected]> wrote: >> Personally, I like to use git for my development. >> >> I know that other projects in apache commit to a main svn, but have a branch >> git that people can pull from. See >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToContribute where they mention that >> they have an apache git that mirrors the svn. >> >> -Jesse Yates >> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Adam Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I've heard a lot of people express a preference for git over svn. What do >>> people think about the prospect of using git (presumably on github) rather >>> than Apache's svn servers for Accumulo? Would this be compatible with the >>> other Apache infrastructure we would like to use (jira, confluence, etc.)? >>> Has any other Apache project gone this route? >>> >>> Adam >>> >>
