+1 on my side. It can helpful to match some AutoDeploy terminologies ;) Regards JB ------Original Message------ From: Martijn van Berkum To: [email protected] ReplyTo: [email protected] Subject: RE: Terminology Sent: Nov 12, 2009 11:11
Also +1 on updating the terminology, they are confusing for a first time user. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Toni Menzel Sent: donderdag 12 november 2009 10:43 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Terminology +1 for updating terminology. I have exactly the same issue since i started working with ace. Personally i had issues with understanding the real meaning of: [Gateway] They are basically the provisioning targets, management agent runs on them) I had trouble with getting used to it but now it works. Still, to me this term seems a bit outdates to me. (like a term from the 90s). [License] This is more about assigning bundle groups to gateways. Routhly speaking: license is one possible implementation to archive this, but having license as a core concept is really not necessary, and also confusing. So, what i'm saying here is not just a renaming, its more about trimming the core down and make the license concept an optional implementation "plugin". On the other hand, bundles & groups are fairly straightforward ;) .. Toni On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > afaik the current terminology for ACE uses bundles, groups and license. > I know that this has historical background, but I somehow feel uneasy > with these :) > So what do you think of changing them, especially license might cause > problems. > > This is not a must. > > Given that we might change this, where do we have to apply these changes? > > Carsten > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [email protected] > -- Toni Menzel Independent Software Developer Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com [email protected] http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software.
