+1 on artifact and feature, too. And the oddest of all terms to me was "license", which i agree with Carsten, distribution kind of makes sense to me in this context. A "assembly" to me is more generic and does not tell that we assign a "target" already. Distribution tells that we not "assemble" something but "distribute" something. hope this was not too confusing ?
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>wrote: > Ok, so far I think we "agreed" to use artifact and feature. > > So the final term is "license" :) > As suggestions we have "product", "distribution", "configuration", > "assembly", "composition" (hope I did not overlook a proposal) > > The most neutral term would be "assembly", I guess. I personally like > "distribution" in this context a little bit more, but "assembly" would > be fine as well :) > > WDYT? > > Carsten > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [email protected] > -- Toni Menzel Independent Software Developer Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com [email protected] http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software.
