[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999264#comment-12999264
]
Geert Schuring commented on ACE-129:
------------------------------------
I do not agree on this. First of all the behavior you are describing is the
default for maven-bundle-plugin. See
http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-maven-bundle-plugin-bnd.html
Secondly, we should stick to the maven conventions for setting groupId and
artifactId and use ${groupId}.${artifactId} if the combined value is needed
somewhere.
> Use artifactId naming convention as used in Felix
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACE-129
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-129
> Project: Ace
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> To be compliant with most OSGi projects, including Apache Felix, the
> artifactId of our bundles should look like:
> groupId: org.apache.ace
> artifactId: org.apache.ace.client.automation
> Like this, we will be able to directly use the artifactId in the
> Bundle-SymbolicName of the Felix maven-bundle-plugin.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
