[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999266#comment-12999266
]
Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on ACE-129:
------------------------------------------
Sorry, but I'm not sure to follow you.
The OSGi naming convention is ${groupId}/${groupId}.${artifactId}.
For instance, if you go on the central repo, you will see:
org/osgi/org.osgi.core/4.2.0
org/osgi/org.osgi.compendium/4.2.0
org/apache/felix/framework/org.apache.felix.framework/3.0.8
org/apache/karaf/admin/org.apache.karaf.admin.core/2.1.3
My purpose is to use this naming convention for groupId/artifactId in ACE.
It's just to be consistent with other OSGi projects.
> Use artifactId naming convention as used in Felix
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACE-129
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-129
> Project: Ace
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> To be compliant with most OSGi projects, including Apache Felix, the
> artifactId of our bundles should look like:
> groupId: org.apache.ace
> artifactId: org.apache.ace.client.automation
> Like this, we will be able to directly use the artifactId in the
> Bundle-SymbolicName of the Felix maven-bundle-plugin.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
