On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's not the point; but git has a completely different branching/tagging > model than svn. The "problem" is that tags are not folders (as in SVN) but > a special concept you apply to a commit directly. Which also means that you > tag the entire repository. And this is simply not true (logically at least) > for a multi-module project with different versions per module.
Correct, this is not how git works. It would be awkward at the very least.. Submodules are there to tie a big project together from.. well modules but still they will all have their own repository. Then again it really isn't that big a deal as a repo is just a .git dir in the end and in this way a lot more manageable then one big ass svndump. No binding opinion on applying for a test, but I'd like ACE to graduate 8) grz Bram [0] http://book.git-scm.com/5_submodules.html > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:42, Marcel Offermans <marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl >> wrote: > >> Not at all, in fact all Apache projects share one single SVN repository. >> >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Chris Brind wrote: >> >> > I presume ace doesn't have 60 svn repos. What's stopping a git repo >> > being set up in the same way? >> > >> > Cheers >> > Chris >> > >> > >> > Sent from iPhone >> > >> > >> > On 29 Nov 2011, at 09:25, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> I'm not sure if taking git here would be best choice. Don't forget that >> >> this would require an own git repo for each module of ace; And I'm not >> sure >> >> if the ASF will be happy creating 60+ repos for ace ;-) >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Andreas >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:20, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> FYI, I know, with the graduation there are other topics on the agenda, >> but >> >>> it might be of interest anyway. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >>> From: Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> >> >>> Date: Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM >> >>> Subject: Fwd: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption >> >>> To: dev <d...@servicemix.apache.org>, d...@karaf.apache.org, >> >>> d...@camel.apache.org, dev <d...@activemq.apache.org>, >> d...@cxf.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> FYI >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >>> From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> >> >>> Date: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:28 >> >>> Subject: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption >> >>> To: Apache Infrastructure <infrastruct...@apache.org> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> While many of you are aware of the ongoing "experiment/alpha test" >> >>> with git hosting for CouchDB, you may not be aware of the recent >> >>> members@ discussion about git @ Apache, the result of which is to >> >>> solicit proposals here for projects interested in adopting git now, >> >>> rather than after the testing phase is over. >> >>> >> >>> Any such projects you participate in should write a brief and civil >> >>> proposal as to why we should select you for further git testing. >> >>> Proposals should include statements of interest in assisting with >> >>> the git hosting codebase and associated jira issues from named >> >>> individuals on the project. >> >>> >> >>> We'll allow the remainder of the week to collect proposals before >> >>> deciding on who gets to go next. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> ------------------------ >> >>> Guillaume Nodet >> >>> ------------------------ >> >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >>> ------------------------ >> >>> Open Source SOA >> >>> http://fusesource.com >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com> >> >>> >> >> >
