Julien,

for our current work in OAuth-ACE we don't need such support since the
equivalent functionality is already provided in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-02

It is work we re-use from OAuth and it nicely integrated into the rest
of the flow exchange.

Ciao
Hannes

On 06/03/2016 05:08 PM, Samuel Erdtman wrote:
> The company I previously worked for where looking into adopting EST for
> this purpose, the benefit of EST compared to cmp or scep was that it
> defined the process for server side generated keys, which could be
> beneficial if key generation would be to cumbersome for the device or if
> you don't trust the device to generate a "good" key.
> 
> Maybe Shahid could give sold more updates since he was helping us with
> this project
> 
> On Thursday, 2 June 2016, Julien Vermillard <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
>     In industrial or enterprise M2M/IoT application we often use PSK for
>     authentication, but more and more user want to enroll the device on
>     their public key infrastructure like they does with some routers
>     using SCEP/CMP.
> 
>     I wonder if it was explored to enroll devices, and renew
>     certificates on PKI only using CoAP and not HTTP?
> 
>     --
>     Julien Vermillard
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ace mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Reply via email to