Agree with the direction toward group communication. This roughly aligns with goals of <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardjono-ace-fluffy/> which is inclusive of group key management for symmetric. Fluffy has broader key management goals, but symmetric group key management is a great place to start.
It also aligns with directions the OCF are heading as they see value in the use of group keys for doing secure discovery. Ned Smith Principal IoT Security Architect Intel SSG-OTC [email protected] +1.503.712.3695 On 7/20/16, 3:07 AM, "Hannes Tschofenig" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi all, > >at the ACE meeting today I asked the participants whether they are in >favor of adding low latency group communication security work in the ACE >group. > >20 persons were in favor of doing the work. > >5 people argued against doing this work. > >If you haven't been at the meeting please contribute your thoughts here >on the list. If you believe you do not have enough information please >also speak up. > >Ciao >Hannes > _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
