OK. 

I added two more options in the original doodle poll:
Option 5. 16th Feb, Thursday, GMT 14:00 ~ 15:00.
Option 6. 16th Feb, Thursday, GMT 15:00 ~ 15:59.

Please fill out the two additional doodle poll options:
http://doodle.com/poll/v6nbeggazekaq2ut

I will check the results at the end of this week.

Thanks,
Kind Regards
Kepeng

发件人:  "Eliot Lear (elear)" <[email protected]>
日期:  Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 8:00 PM
至:  Li Kepeng <[email protected]>
抄送:  Michael StJohns <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
主题:  Re: [Ace] Doodle for ACE virtual interim meeting

I think at least one of the draft authors is away until the 8th.  Can we
push out a week?

Eliot

On Jan 13, 2017, at 6:01 PM, Kepeng Li <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh, sorry, my mistake.
> 
> I made a mistake between you and Mike Jones.
> 
> Let’s change our call to Option 1, 9th Feb, Thursday, GMT 14:00 ~ 15:00.
> 
> I will send out the WebEx info later.
> 
> Kind Regards
> Kepeng
> 
> 发件人: Ace <[email protected]> on behalf of Michael StJohns
> <[email protected]>
> 日期: Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 12:28 AM
> 至: <[email protected]>
> 主题: Re: [Ace] Doodle for ACE virtual interim meeting
> 
> On 1/13/2017 4:44 AM, Kepeng Li wrote:
>> Hallo all,
>> 
>> According to the doodle poll, let’s have a call on 14th Feb, GMT 15:00 ~
>> 15:59.
>> 
>> We have the same amount of participants about Option 1, 2, and 4.
>> 
>> Considering that Mike has strong position about this draft, so I accommodate
>> his choice to allow him to participate.
> Sorry what?   I'm assuming by "Mike" you mean me. I missed the original doodle
> call and haven't actually made a choice.  I can't actually make the 14th as
> I'm on a plane.
> 
> I can make either of the Thursday 9 February times though.
> 
> In any event, if the slides are ready ahead of time I'll just provide some
> commentary on the mailing list.   I note that the authors haven't engaged with
> the comments provided by Jim Schaad and it would be useful if they do so.
> 
> WRT to the document, its difficult to make any judgements or suggest any
> improvements without understanding the goals of the document.  As a bare
> minimum, up front the document should a) define "low latency" including each
> element that contributes to the calculation  (this has been a moving target -
> it was something like 250ms for DICE and appears to have moved downward in
> ACE) and b) define the security services that are to be provided when using
> the keys served up by this protocol.   (e.g. it currently appears that the
> document is proposing a key management scheme for group confidentiality, group
> integrity and group authentication).   Lastly, the document needs to include
> any other constraints.  In the instant case, low latency may be accomplished
> by hardware for public key operations - but there is a constraint never
> actually cited in the document - low/no cost for the build of the product
> (it's referred to obliquely as processing cost for the constrained device and
> is more properly attributed to the BOM).
> 
> If there is any other application besides lighting that has a use for this
> protocol - now is the time to bring it forward.
> 
> Finally, a statement of security requirements for the exemplar application
> (lighting) should be provided so that the protocol can be evaluated against
> those requirements to see if we've actually managed to come up with something
> that meets the needs.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
>> 
>> Authors, please prepare some slides for the discussion.
>> 
>> I will send the WebEx information later.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Kind Regards
>> Kepeng
>> 
>> 发件人: Ace <[email protected]> on behalf of Li Kepeng
>> <[email protected]>
>> 日期: Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 8:43 PM
>> 至: ace <[email protected]>
>> 抄送: Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]>, Hannes Tschofenig
>> <[email protected]>
>> 主题: [Ace] Doodle for ACE virtual interim meeting
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> To speed up our progress on group communication security draft, we plan to
>> have a virtual interim meeting in the middle of Feb.
>> 
>> I proposed four options for the meeting time:
>> 1. 9th Feb, Thursday, GMT 14:00 ~ 15:00.
>> 2. 9th Feb, Thursday, GMT 15:00 ~ 15:59.
>> 3. 14th Feb, Tuesday, GMT 14:00 ~ 15:00.
>> 4. 14th Feb, Tuesday, GMT 15:00 ~ 15:59.
>> 
>> Please indicate your available time from the doodle poll:
>> http://doodle.com/poll/v6nbeggazekaq2ut
>> 
>> We will mainly discuss this draft:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-somaraju-ace-multicast/
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Kind Regards
>> Kepeng 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ace mailing list
>> [email protected]https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
> 
> _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
> _______________________________________________
> Ace mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace


_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Reply via email to