On Nov 13, 2017, at 10:32, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm less convinced that we ought to be using this mechanism to shorten > /.well-known/est to /est (why stop there? can't we go to /?)
Why do you think that a node can only have one EST endpoint? It should be possible to have many, and the client should be able to choose the one that is actually doing the right thing for them. > It seems like maybe a 301-like (Moved Permantly) reply from > /.well-known/est/*, but CoAP doesn't have 301 codes…. (The link-format self-description is exactly the replacement for the HTTP 301 here. Same number of roundtrips...) Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
