On Feb 18, 2018, at 08:35, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Carsten, > > We should maybe add that this information is provisioned either during > manufacturing, via a commissioning tool or some other mechanisms. Not sure > whether this will indeed add more but it might be useful to know.
For a protocol that is meant to be interoperable, there need to be standard (if not MTI) ways of getting this done. At least we need to have a defined interface between CAM (“commissioning tool”) and C for letting C know what was agreed about how to address AS and which RSes it should be used for. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
