+1. I think this is a problem that needs to be solved. But I do think that the OAuth or PubSub requirement is a strong one. I would like to see if the MLS work could be used in these environments too https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mls-protocol/ Using the OAuth draft or the PubSub one for authorization and group join is fine, but there will be environments where that will not be possible, so I was wondering if https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mls-protocol-02 could be leveraged.
Rgs, Panos From: Ace <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Peter van der Stok Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2018 4:39 AM To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ace] Call for adoption of draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm I support the adoption of this draft. It is the right solution to our secure group communication wishes. Peter Roman Danyliw schreef op 2018-11-30 22:58: Hello! This is the start of a two week call for input on the WG adoption of the document: draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm-02 The document has been presented and discussed at the last few meetings; and revisions have been made based on WG feedback. At the IETF 103 meeting, there was support for adoption; and volunteers to review and implement the draft. Please provide feedback to the list/chairs if you believe that this document should be adopted as a WG document. The adoption call will end on December 14 2018. Regards, Roman and Jim _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
