That "rs_cnf" claim registration request in 9.1 points to 3.3 which says it has 'the same syntax and semantics as defined in for the "rs_cnf" parameter', which I think is in 4.1. And 4.1 says that the "rs_cnf" values 'follow the syntax of the "cnf" claim from section 3.1 of [I-D.ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession].' Similar to other comments I've made today, I don't follow what that would mean for the value of the claim when it's a JWT. And that seems like something that's important to understand for the purpose of a JWT claims registry request.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:11 AM Ludwig Seitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello JWT registry reviewers, > > the IESG-designated experts for the JWT claims registry have asked me to > send a review request to you about the "rs_cnf" claim registered here: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-07#section-9.1 > > Thank you in advance for you review comments. > > Regards, > > Ludwig > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
