Hi Carsten,
The imagination will not have finished its work in 10 yeras time if coap
and the authorization will enjoy the success they merit.
Also I don't see anybody being ready to start such a document the
coming month.
Do you see another document in which a first set of these registrations
can be added?
FYI, today I do my iplementation and (to my regret) will invent
something of my own.
cheerio,
Peter
Carsten Bormann schreef op 2020-05-04 08:51:
On 2020-05-04, at 08:42, Seitz Ludwig <[email protected]> wrote:
For the sake of getting the document finished before I die of old age ;-) would
it be possible to specify this in a separate document?
I think there may be multiple of these RT registrations, because the fact that
a resource is part of an AS is only part of the information that is needed: The
RT could tell us more about the way the AS wants to be used.
I think that is a strong argument to *not* do these RT registrations in the
framework, because we will not have enough imagination to catch them all.
So my recommendation would indeed be a separate document.
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
