Hi All I have published the first draft for the document here is the link to the draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport/ . As Jim mentioned that adopting this might need change in the ACE WG charter can we please discuss that in IETF 108 ?
Thanks Mohit On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:01 AM Mohit Sahni <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jim, > Thanks for the feedback. I will go over the EST document and update > sections around DTLS and proxying and address your other comments. Once > ready, I will post the draft in ACE WG. > > Regards, > Mohit > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 7:19 PM Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I suppose that this could go into the ACE working group, but it will >> require a charter change to do so. >> >> >> >> I would suggest that you review the EST document with special attention >> to the sections on DTLS and proxying. It would also help to have some idea >> of guidance for when coap or coaps is going to be used. I am not sure that >> this strongly exists in CMP as my very vague memory was that it was assumed >> that all transactions where going to be done over TLS with server >> validation as a minimum. >> >> >> >> Jim >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Spasm <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Mohit Sahni >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 4, 2020 10:49 PM >> *To:* Tomas Gustavsson <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* LAMPS WG <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [lamps] CMPv2/LightWeiight-CMP profile over CoAP transport >> >> >> >> Hi Tomas >> >> Thanks for the feedback, I was trying to write it in a way so that it can >> work for both CMPv2 and LightWeight CMP, I have noted it your feedback and >> I will try to make it more clear. >> >> >> >> -Mohit >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:40 PM Tomas Gustavsson <[email protected] >> <[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that section 4, Proxy Support (good section btw), mentions >> Announcement messages. These are excluded from the Lightweight >> specification. Since the LIghtweight specification is mentioned in the >> beginning, I'm not sure if that's worth mentioning here? >> >> Cheers, >> Tomas >> >> On 2020-06-04 20:03, Mohit Sahni wrote: >> > Hi Jim, >> > There were some discussions about using CoAP as transport for the >> > Lightweight CMP profile in the last LAMPS WG meeting. After having some >> > discussions with Hendrik, David, and Andreas I have written an >> > internet-draft for using CoAP as transport for CMPv2 / Light Weight CMP >> > Profile. If I am not mistaken, the recommendation was to present this >> > draft to ACE WG for the review instead of Lamps group, can you please >> > advice on that? >> > >> > Here is the link to the internet-draft that I wrote >> > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-msahni-tbd-cmpv2-coap-transport-00.txt >> > >> > Thanks >> > Mohit >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Spasm mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spasm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm >> >>
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
