Mohit Thanks for the update. I'm looking forward to the discussion in ACE. Hendrik
Von: Mohit Sahni <[email protected]> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juli 2020 00:06 Hi All I have published the first draft for the document here is the link to the draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport/. As Jim mentioned that adopting this might need change in the ACE WG charter can we please discuss that in IETF 108 ? Thanks Mohit On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:01 AM Mohit Sahni <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for the feedback. I will go over the EST document and update sections around DTLS and proxying and address your other comments. Once ready, I will post the draft in ACE WG. Regards, Mohit On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 7:19 PM Jim Schaad <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I suppose that this could go into the ACE working group, but it will require a charter change to do so. I would suggest that you review the EST document with special attention to the sections on DTLS and proxying. It would also help to have some idea of guidance for when coap or coaps is going to be used. I am not sure that this strongly exists in CMP as my very vague memory was that it was assumed that all transactions where going to be done over TLS with server validation as a minimum. Jim From: Spasm <mailto:[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mohit Sahni Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 10:49 PM To: Tomas Gustavsson <mailto:[email protected]> Cc: LAMPS WG <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lamps] CMPv2/LightWeiight-CMP profile over CoAP transport Hi Tomas Thanks for the feedback, I was trying to write it in a way so that it can work for both CMPv2 and LightWeight CMP, I have noted it your feedback and I will try to make it more clear. -Mohit On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:40 PM Tomas Gustavsson <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Hi, I noticed that section 4, Proxy Support (good section btw), mentions Announcement messages. These are excluded from the Lightweight specification. Since the LIghtweight specification is mentioned in the beginning, I'm not sure if that's worth mentioning here? Cheers, Tomas On 2020-06-04 20:03, Mohit Sahni wrote: > Hi Jim, > There were some discussions about using CoAP as transport for the > Lightweight CMP profile in the last LAMPS WG meeting. After having some > discussions with Hendrik, David, and Andreas I have written an > internet-draft for using CoAP as transport for CMPv2 / Light Weight CMP > Profile. If I am not mistaken, the recommendation was to present this > draft to ACE WG for the review instead of Lamps group, can you please > advice on that? > > Here is the link to the internet-draft that I wrote > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-msahni-tbd-cmpv2-coap-transport-00.txt&data=02%7C01%7Chendrik.brockhaus%40siemens.com%7C7553d8af26034360311208d82778f6a0%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637302747769875510&sdata=%2BUhTMJjgH8J3gVVyVa8eYZe0cNO8AKZNK8Axi5RZAgc%3D&reserved=0 > > > Thanks > Mohit > > _______________________________________________ > Spasm mailing list > mailto:[email protected] > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspasm&data=02%7C01%7Chendrik.brockhaus%40siemens.com%7C7553d8af26034360311208d82778f6a0%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637302747769885467&sdata=SBDJa6P7%2Fd5OSQ4wnd8o%2FuO2PJg5esYnXtKmHlBcTao%3D&reserved=0 > _______________________________________________ Spasm mailing list mailto:[email protected] https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspasm&data=02%7C01%7Chendrik.brockhaus%40siemens.com%7C7553d8af26034360311208d82778f6a0%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637302747769890437&sdata=h5iBuM%2BxucjGNAESzoAIQ26To55izeklFeuYGUkXYfc%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
