Hello, I support the adoption as well. As Jim said, the MQTT-TLS profile has adopted the AIF-MQTT for the scope.
Thanks, --Cigdem On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:25 PM Marco Tiloca <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I support adoption of this document and I am willing to review it. > > The approach in ace-key-groupcomm-oscore for joining OSCORE groups is > now using an AIF specific data model, also included in our ACE > implementation for Californium. > > I plan to extend the implementation to support the Extended > REST-specific model. > > Best, > /Marco > > On 2020-07-15 22:51, Jim Schaad wrote: > > I had been holding off doing an adoption call waiting for a formal > request > > to adopt it. However, given that this is now a dependency for three > > different WG documents I think we need to do this now. > > > > Adoption call for > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-core-ace-aif/ > > > > This document provides a template for an authorization information format > > (AIF) using a CDDL generic. Questions to be answered: > > > > 1. Do you think the ACE WG should adopt this document? If not please > > provide some reasoning. > > > > 2. If adopted are you willing to review the document? > > > > 3. Would you have any implementation plans? Currently this is > referenced > > by the MQTT-TLS document, the Group KDC documents. > > > > Adoption call ends on July 28. > > > > Jim & Daniel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ace mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > > -- > Marco Tiloca > Ph.D., Senior Researcher > > RISE Research Institutes of Sweden > Division ICT > Isafjordsgatan 22 / Kistagången 16 > SE-164 40 Kista (Sweden) > > Phone: +46 (0)70 60 46 501 > https://www.ri.se > > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace >
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
