Thanks. I am ready to push the next version to the IESG. Thank you all for moving this document.
Yours Daniel On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 5:30 PM Saurabh Tripathi < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mohit, > > I am not aware of any IPR. > > --Saurabh > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 2:18 PM Mohit Sahni <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Please find answers to your questions: >> A) Currently there is an open source implementation to support CMP over >> CoAP maintained by @David von Oheimb <[email protected]>. I >> believe these do not follow the draft exactly but are based on this draft. >> Here are github links: >> >> - https://github.com/siemens/LightweightCmpRa >> >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_siemens_LightweightCmpRa&d=DwMFaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFWe5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=ZOdGf2OQ8EYofyZRMf0bHltv3S89_8OfM7ykqC8-cvA&m=HYATU_g3NfOO8cMsDWF7hUXVleiwuE4kv8hH17Mzk5c&s=Ck7iZwTTMXwZp5qhZJ5UPta4b3n6MeQg97vmgl0nVnE&e=> >> - https://github.com/siemens/embeddedCMP >> >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_siemens_embeddedCMP&d=DwMFaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFWe5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=ZOdGf2OQ8EYofyZRMf0bHltv3S89_8OfM7ykqC8-cvA&m=HYATU_g3NfOO8cMsDWF7hUXVleiwuE4kv8hH17Mzk5c&s=T4mI0MvZMWr3puXUJ9sEy2izdpL1g1cGFeBx5GYJyB4&e=> >> >> B) I can confirm that I am not aware of any IPR. Adding @Saurabh Tripathi >> <[email protected]> to confirm on this side also. >> >> C) I generated the document using the xml2rfc v3 tool. The boilerplate is >> generated by the xml2rfc tool based on xml tags. It could be an issue with >> the NITS tool or XML2RFC tool, I will try to generate another txt version >> based on latest version of the tool or fix the issue manually. >> >> D) I will add a note for IANA mentioning this. Can you please review if >> this note looks good? >> >> This Internet draft references the .well-known/cmp temporary IANA >> registry [Link to: >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xhtml >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.iana.org_assignments_well-2Dknown-2Duris_well-2Dknown-2Duris.xhtml&d=DwMFaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFWe5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=ZOdGf2OQ8EYofyZRMf0bHltv3S89_8OfM7ykqC8-cvA&m=HYATU_g3NfOO8cMsDWF7hUXVleiwuE4kv8hH17Mzk5c&s=a2BlPpzMwKPT5yrPzFc731SADo9AVmndkKmo_sIKas4&e=>]. >> Please add a reference of this draft to the .well-known/cmp registry and if >> this draft is published before [I-D.ietf-lamps-cmp-updates] please make the >> .well-known/cmp registry permanent based on this draft's publication. >> >> E) Can you confirm if this change looks good to you? >> OLD: >> This document requires a new entry to the CoAP Content-Formats >> Registry code for the content-type "application/pkixcmp" for >> transfering CMP transactions over CoAP. >> >> Type name: application >> >> Subtype name: pkixcmp >> >> NEW: >> This document requires a new entry to the CoAP Content-Formats >> Registry code for the content-type "application/pkixcmp" for >> transfering CMP transactions over CoAP from the identifier >> range 256-9999 reserved for IETF specifications. >> >> Type name: application >> >> Subtype name: pkixcmp >> >> Encoding: Content may contain arbitrary octet >> values. The octet values are the ASN.1 DER >> encoding of a PKI message, as defined in the >> [RFC4210] specifications. >> >> Reference: This internet draft and RFC4210 >> >> Thanks a lot for your help moving this forward. >> >> Regards >> Mohit >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:37 PM Daniel Migault <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here are some information I need to complete the shepherd: >>> >>> A. Do we have existing implementation or intention to implement it. >>> >>> B. Can both co-authors confirm they are not aware of any IPR. >>> >>> C. The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, >>> even if >>> >>> it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords -- however, there's a paragraph >>> with >>> a matching beginning. Boilerplate error? >>> >>> D. .The draft uses .well-known/cmp. .well-known/cmp is indicated as >>> temporary [iana] and cmp-updates is still a draft. I am not sure we need to >>> wait for cmp-updates to be published, but if the draft is abandoned we may >>> need to indicate IANA that the cmp needs to be moved to permanent after >>> 2022-05-20 - or may be at the publication of this draft. I suggest we add >>> a note in the IANA section which could be removed by IANA or the RFC >>> editor. >>> >>> E. I am not sure the registration of pkiccmp does not need more >>> information. More especially, I see >>> >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/core-parameters/core-parameters.xhtml#content-formats >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.iana.org_assignments_core-2Dparameters_core-2Dparameters.xhtml-23content-2Dformats&d=DwMFaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFWe5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=ZOdGf2OQ8EYofyZRMf0bHltv3S89_8OfM7ykqC8-cvA&m=HYATU_g3NfOO8cMsDWF7hUXVleiwuE4kv8hH17Mzk5c&s=FEM3wm5EidYOaq1P8f_ttf01fuCvqRwdvyLYGWQpelM&e=> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7252.html#section-12.3 >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.rfc-2Deditor.org_rfc_rfc7252.html-23section-2D12.3&d=DwMFaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFWe5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=ZOdGf2OQ8EYofyZRMf0bHltv3S89_8OfM7ykqC8-cvA&m=HYATU_g3NfOO8cMsDWF7hUXVleiwuE4kv8hH17Mzk5c&s=nqyc0oepdjMtut1f6ksijcbyRAExj6jBgREVcQcDq6Q&e=> >>> >>> Please check what is needed and make sure the IANA is correct. >>> >>> Yours, >>> Daniel >>> >>> -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
