I'd like to hear who is in favor as well.

It might be useful to provide something concrete to review... a PR, or a
diff, or something.

Deb

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 8:44 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> {striping IESG, because it would be just noise until the WGs come to some
> consensus}
>
> Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote:
>     > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 10:45:54PM +0100, Michael Richardson wrote:
>     >> Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: > You want to do this now?
>     >> After (or your ask was right before) the telechat?
>     >>
>     >> I figured better to ask now than after the telechat was all over.
> My
>     >> appologies for forgetting this before.
>     >>
>     >> > If you want to do this, I'd like the working group to weigh in
> (for
>     >> > whatever definition of 'working group' is best - at least lamps,
> and
>     >> likely > others).
>     >>
>     >> RFC9148 was done by ACE.  draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher (aka
>     >> cBRSKI) uses/extends RFC9148.  Thus ANIMA and ACE are in the CC.
>
>     > In my only partially informed opinion there's a decent case for
> having
>     > draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs update 9418, but if we end up doing
>     > so it would mean writing at least a paragraph more text (and maybe
>
> You want more text than Toerless offered?
> https://github.com/lamps-wg/lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs/pull/59/files
>
>     > more).  I would not be particularly upset if the Updates:
> relationship
>     > was not added.  (It could be done in a separate document later if it
>     > proves needed; I note that the /att path is optional for EST-coaps.)
>
> That seems excessive!
> It's been 10+ days since I posted this thought.
> Is there anyone who thinks this is a bad idea?
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list -- sp...@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to spasm-le...@ietf.org
>
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list -- ace@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ace-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to