I don't see any comments except for those who commented above (Toerless and Ben). Do your coauthors agree?
Deb On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 1:45 PM Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: > > crickets? What is the plan? > > I don't think its up to me to say it's a good or bad idea. > You asked that we get an endorsement for this text from ACE and ANIMA. > So far, no objections. Do you see rough consensus? > > > The PR is ok, except you need to add something to the abstract to say > > you are updating RFC 9148. > > Yes, I will add that to the PR. > > +RFC9148 is derived from RFC7030, and it is also updated. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list -- ace@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ace-le...@ietf.org
