Dear Tim, Dear Paul Today I came across erratum #8523 to RFC 9482 (CMP transfer over CoAP). The last communication on this was https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/qv2nOI_ORN7memcRexahBH__9EQ/. Basically, this is a clarification. The ASN.1 module of RFC 4210 and RFC 9810 contain the types 'PKIMessage' and 'PKIMessages', see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9810#section-5.1. The text should always use 'PKIMessage structures' instead of 'PKIMessages' as the plural of 'PKIMessage'. Can you approve the erratum? It can be flagged as technical or editorial. Both are justified. Since the erratum refers to sections 2, 2.3, and 2.5, does David need to create three errata, or is one sufficient for all three locations?
Thank you for your support, Hendrik
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
