Thanks for the reminder and confirmation, I have marked it as Verified
Paul On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 4:58 AM Brockhaus, Hendrik < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Tim, Dear Paul > > > > Today I came across erratum #8523 to RFC 9482 (CMP transfer over CoAP). > The last communication on this was > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/qv2nOI_ORN7memcRexahBH__9EQ/. > > Basically, this is a clarification. The ASN.1 module of RFC 4210 and RFC > 9810 contain the types ‘PKIMessage’ and ‘PKIMessages’, see > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9810#section-5.1. The text > should always use 'PKIMessage structures' instead of 'PKIMessages' as the > plural of ‘PKIMessage’. > > Can you approve the erratum? It can be flagged as technical or editorial. > Both are justified. > > Since the erratum refers to sections 2, 2.3, and 2.5, does David need to > create three errata, or is one sufficient for all three locations? > > > > Thank you for your support, > > Hendrik >
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
