Ben Alex wrote:
As the needs are fairly broad, might I suggest sending the proposed
schema to this list so people can discuss before you go to the trouble
of implementing it? I know you're volunteering to help - so we'll be
happy with whatever you contribute - but it would be great to ensure
everything gets covered in this enhanced MutableAuthenticationDao and
core implementation schema. While I think of it, we should require (via
the interface contract) for MutableAuthenticationDao implementations to
call "userCache.removeUserFromCache(String username)" at appropriate times.
OK, I pretty new to Acegi - I follow the list since yesterday but of
course do not want to make anything that wouldn't add much value to
ageci. Let's do it once and let's do it good.
The thread is at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00337.html.
It will take a while for me to jump into details. How much of this
concept is already implemented?
--
.:. Piotr Maj .:.
.:. pgp 0xA07B0711 .:.
.:. ant [EMAIL PROTECTED] kernelpanic.pl .:.
.:. http://kernelpanic.pl/ .:. http://jdn.pl/ .:.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
