+1 even though here at Rutgers we are happily using sub-1.x versions in
production :-) Scott McCrory wrote: On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:13:18 -0500, Matt Raible wroteFinally, the status of the project is up for discussion. I met Rod a few days back and we briefly discussed making Acegi Security a formal Spring subproject. This, coupled with a 1.0.0+ version number, would make some people and organisations more comfortable using it. What does the community think of this idea?+1MattI forgot my +1 on this as well. Scott ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer |
- [Acegisecurity-developer] Road... Ben Alex
- RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Sergio Berna
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Ben Alex
- RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Sergio Berna
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Ben Alex
- RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Sergio Berna
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Scott McCrory
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Ben Alex
- [Acegisecurity-developer] Re: ... Matt Raible
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Scott McCrory
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Dmitriy Kopylenko
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ... Ben Alex
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.7.0 Colin Sampaleanu