+1 even though here at Rutgers we are happily using sub-1.x versions in production :-)

Scott McCrory wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:13:18 -0500, Matt Raible wrote
  
Finally, the status of the project is up for discussion. I met Rod a 
few days back and we briefly discussed making Acegi Security a formal 
Spring subproject. This, coupled with a 1.0.0+ version number, would 
make some people and organisations more comfortable using it. What 
does the community think of this idea?
      
+1

Matt
    


I forgot my +1 on this as well.
   Scott


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
  

Reply via email to