I’m wondering if there was a reason that most of Acegi’s standard ACL classes use int when dealing with object id values.  We usually default to using ‘long’ instead of ‘int’ – and I believe that other places do as well, so it seems to me that it might be simpler to use ‘long’ in the acegi classes, since the java compiler can automatically cast int to long anyway.

 

Just my two cents.

 

-tim

Reply via email to