I’m wondering if there was a reason that most of Acegi’s
standard ACL classes use int when dealing with object id values. We usually
default to using ‘long’ instead of ‘int’ – and I
believe that other places do as well, so it seems to me that it might be
simpler to use ‘long’ in the acegi classes, since the java compiler
can automatically cast int to long anyway. Just my two cents. -tim |
- [Acegisecurity-developer] using long for acegi acl id parame... Tim Kettering
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] using long for acegi acl ... Ben Alex
- RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] using long for acegi ... Tim Kettering
- RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] using long for ac... Tim Kettering
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] using long fo... Ben Alex
- Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] using lo... Ray Krueger