Hi Ben, The configuration was referencing "net.sf"... some of the config was moved over to "org." however not all. Including the userdetails refactoring. Plus some of the JSPs were also referencing "net.sf" in page imports.
I am running through and testing the app right now, currently failing on a call to getPrincipal from User object... I will fix it up, retest it, run the unit testing and check in the changes. Re: the tutorial app... yeah I noticed that .. very nice... much more concise config. I am usng Spring 2.0 and I am really digging the schema-based config... I am also using MethodSecurityInterceptors using the new Aspect pointcuts. Not sure if we should also include examples of usage using Spring 2.0? I assume we need to wait for it to go final. Uri is on it...Great, I'll keep my eyes posted for <acegi:config> :) Cheers Mark On 5/30/06, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark St.Godard wrote: > > Just a note, Ben I will be updating the contacts-tiger sample project, > > I noticed it was not converted over. I will create an JIRA entry for > > myself and update this tomorow. > > > I just checked and it looked to me like it was built for 1.0.0. What > specifically wasn't converted? > > > Also with Spring 2.0, I noticed that a jira entry was created for > > namespace handlers, XSD support, etc.. > > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-271 for those > interested. > > > If you have someone to do this fine... otherwise I can take it up... > > its something that I would really like to get in... and reduce some > > of the XML verbosity. > > > > > Uri Boness has volunteered, but I'm unsure whether work has commenced. I > am happy for anyone to take a look at it who has sufficient time. > > As for verbose XML, I'd encourage people to take a look at the new > tutorial sample, which is just 148 lines of XML. This includes comments, > whitespace and full support for form authentication, remember-me, > anonymous and web request authorization. I think that's a pretty good > base given the features, but nevertheless it will be even less with > SEC-271 improvements. > > Cheers > Ben > > > _______________________________________________ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > _______________________________________________ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
