I saw that, my should it have been 1.0.1 though? On 5/30/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I took the freedom also to tag the source tree and bump the pom > versions to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT > > On 5/30/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll take care of that > > > > On 5/30/06, Ray Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can we get the maven repos updated? > > > Right now mvn compile fails because > > > "org.acegisecurity:acegi-security-parent:pom:1.0.0" cannot be > > > downloaded. > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Mark St.Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > > > The configuration was referencing "net.sf"... some of the config was > > > > moved over to "org." however not all. Including the userdetails > > > > refactoring. Plus some of the JSPs were also referencing "net.sf" in > > > > page imports. > > > > > > > > I am running through and testing the app right now, currently failing > > > > on a call to getPrincipal from User object... I will fix it up, retest > > > > it, run the unit testing and check in the changes. > > > > > > > > Re: the tutorial app... yeah I noticed that .. very nice... much more > > > > concise config. > > > > > > > > I am usng Spring 2.0 and I am really digging the schema-based config... > > > > > > > > I am also using MethodSecurityInterceptors using the new Aspect > > > > pointcuts. > > > > Not sure if we should also include examples of usage using Spring 2.0? > > > > I assume we need to wait for it to go final. > > > > > > > > Uri is on it...Great, I'll keep my eyes posted for <acegi:config> :) > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Mark St.Godard wrote: > > > > > > Just a note, Ben I will be updating the contacts-tiger sample > > > > > > project, > > > > > > I noticed it was not converted over. I will create an JIRA entry > > > > > > for > > > > > > myself and update this tomorow. > > > > > > > > > > > I just checked and it looked to me like it was built for 1.0.0. What > > > > > specifically wasn't converted? > > > > > > > > > > > Also with Spring 2.0, I noticed that a jira entry was created for > > > > > > namespace handlers, XSD support, etc.. > > > > > > > > > > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-271 for > > > > > those > > > > > interested. > > > > > > > > > > > If you have someone to do this fine... otherwise I can take it up... > > > > > > its something that I would really like to get in... and reduce some > > > > > > of the XML verbosity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Uri Boness has volunteered, but I'm unsure whether work has > > > > > commenced. I > > > > > am happy for anyone to take a look at it who has sufficient time. > > > > > > > > > > As for verbose XML, I'd encourage people to take a look at the new > > > > > tutorial sample, which is just 148 lines of XML. This includes > > > > > comments, > > > > > whitespace and full support for form authentication, remember-me, > > > > > anonymous and web request authorization. I think that's a pretty good > > > > > base given the features, but nevertheless it will be even less with > > > > > SEC-271 improvements. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > Ben > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > > > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > > > > > > -- > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > > -- The Princess Bride > > > > > -- > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > -- The Princess Bride > > > _______________________________________________ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer >
_______________________________________________ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
