On 07/07/2016 05:18 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > That's the LetsEncrypt protocol, not the IETF ACME protocol. We're not > here to polish the staples and rubber-stamp. /r$, speaking as > co-chair. -- Senior Architect, Akamai I agree with this. Let's Encrypt has planned all along to make some breaking protocol changes as the spec evolves. We will of course give plenty of warning and a long transition period, but it's more important to wind up with a well-designed protocol that can be implemented by multiple parties than it is to preserve our first design forever.
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
