At IETF 96 it was proposed to drop this issue:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-acme.

The rationale from the notes is that nonces are not a scarce resource.
However, cachability and idempotence of GETs were not addressed. I think
it's worth not requiring nonces on GETs purely for those reasons. In
practical terms, this difference has caused real bugs for Let's Encrypt.

Would someone like to present a specific defense of providing a unique
nonce with every GET?

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to