Last month we called for consensus on this, and one person asked for more time.
As co-chair, if there are no objections raised, and discussion started, by next week, we’ll declare that the WG is in at least rough consensus on this issue. Please look at https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/182<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ietf-2Dwg-2Dacme_acme_pull_182&d=DQMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=L1U2k8yIvoeUD7i6XFfqwcpU80klhqxqtLQwTy0hxPQ&s=a8o_Zi8GaJIZPYq9tbeKeNmMMkAWzrLW8XI8wRjIZaU&e=> for sample text. -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies IM: [email protected] Twitter: RichSalz From: Richard Barnes [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:06 PM To: Salz, Rich Cc: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Acme] Terms of service agreement changes So, it's early September... ? On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Okay, then. We'll see if we can get consensus during early September. -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies IM: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Twitter: RichSalz > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 2:36 PM > To: Salz, Rich; Richard Barnes > Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Acme] Terms of service agreement changes > > I disagree strongly on this. I've been on vacation last week, and will be on > vacation through Sep 5, but happy to resume the conversation when I get > back. > > On 08/26/2016 02:47 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> I'd like to try to close the loop on this. I'm hearing pretty broad > agreement here on a few points: > >> - We should keep the full URL in the agreement field > >> - The server can update that URL if it doesn't need re-agreement > >> - The server should indicate the need for agreement with an error > >> https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/182<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ietf-2Dwg-2Dacme_acme_pull_182&d=DQMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=L1U2k8yIvoeUD7i6XFfqwcpU80klhqxqtLQwTy0hxPQ&s=a8o_Zi8GaJIZPYq9tbeKeNmMMkAWzrLW8XI8wRjIZaU&e=> > > I agree that is consensus, as expressed in Berlin on on-list. If you > > disagree, > please post within the next week. > > > > /r$, co-chair > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Acme mailing list > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_acme&d=DQMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=L1U2k8yIvoeUD7i6XFfqwcpU80klhqxqtLQwTy0hxPQ&s=8_PrA_iaCGbCTfg6OUAoqpC_1dgZFtfUC91kW7Ljjds&e=> > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_acme&d=DQMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=L1U2k8yIvoeUD7i6XFfqwcpU80klhqxqtLQwTy0hxPQ&s=8_PrA_iaCGbCTfg6OUAoqpC_1dgZFtfUC91kW7Ljjds&e=>
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
