Please go ahead!

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:22:39PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > Last month we called for consensus on this, and one person asked for
> more time.
> >
> > As co-chair, if there are no objections raised, and discussion
> > started, by next week, we’ll declare that the WG is in at least rough
> > consensus on this issue.
>
> I potentially had more to say on this, but I figured I'd wait on that
> until Jacob was back from vacation and had shared his view on where
> he thought we were currently at with the concerns we'd been discussing.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to