> Surely vendorized keys would be better:
>
> {
> "com.example.blorpNo": "BLORP122946"
> }
Can you provide a bit more details on what you mean by "vendorized keys" and
how it differs from the arbitrary name-value pairs in the proposal?
It seems the above can be represented as:
"ca-extension": [
"com.example.blorpNo": "BLORP122946"
]
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
