> > I'm less worried about this constraint. If there's consensus for a > > change, changes can be made to the BRs much more quickly than an RFC can > be issued. > > Oh yeah, the minimum process latency for changing BRs is ~7 weeks. > > However, that would take well-fleshed proposal to do it even close to that > quick. Take note that "10 methods" took years.
Years is a bit of an exaggeration. One and change, I think it was. And that was to get agreement on all ten methods and to work out exactly how the forum's IPR policy applied to validation methods (which was about 2/3 of the timeline ...). I think a well-written proposal to add or improve an existing validation method could easily get passed in close to the minimum timeline. As the Validation WG chair, I'm even willing to help get secure, well-analyzed and well-specified proposals through the voting process. -Tim
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
