This matches my understanding.  ACME cannot be prescriptive on this, not
least because the notion of a "root certificate" is not well defined for
the server -- the server doesn't know what the client does or does not
trust.


On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The usage model I think we should aim for is where chains are used
> as-is.  For instance, the chain is fed straight to the HTTPS server.
> There is reasonably strong advice against sending trust anchor
> certificates over the wire, and most software simply spools out
> everything it is given.
>
> I thought that we already had this discussion and concluded that roots
> wouldn't be included.  That's consistent with the above.
>
> Obviously that would leave this open to some discretion, but that's
> OK.  For instance, during the period that a new CA has a
> cross-signature on their root, they might include their own anchor for
> maximum compatibility, but they might phase that out over time.  But
> the CA is in a reasonable position to know when to move, and it isn't
> as though this would prevent clients from adding or removing as they
> see fit.
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Jörn Heissler
> <acme-sp...@joern.heissler.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 16:01:24 +0100, Philipp Junghannß wrote:
> >> But isn't the point of this proposal that the client CANNOT be expected
> >> knowing the root like with DANE/TLSA'd servers with a custom root or
> >> whatever?
> >
> > I must admit that I'm not very familiar with DANE.
> >
> > What would be a typical use case where you use ACME but you don't
> > already know the root cert?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Acme mailing list
> > Acme@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to