Hi again Ning, I opened https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/416 just now to resolve these. Since this is strictly editorial it should be possible to merge by EOD.
In the future it would save some time if you were able to provide PRs to address these small changes yourself :-) Thanks! - Daniel / cpu On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Zhang, Ning <[email protected]> wrote: > Should section 7.1.4 list "expired" as a possible status value? Section > 7.1.6 specifies that an Authorization object may end up in the "expired" > status. > > > > By the way, the example in Section 7.1.2.1 has a typo: > > > > Link: <https://example.com/acme/acct/1/orders?cursor=2>, rel="next" > > => > > Link: <https://example.com/acme/acct/1/orders?cursor=2>;rel="next" > > > > Thanks, > > -Ning > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
