Merged & resolved. Thanks again,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Daniel McCarney <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi again Ning, > > I opened https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/416 just now to > resolve these. Since this is strictly editorial it should be possible to > merge by EOD. > > In the future it would save some time if you were able to provide PRs to > address these small changes yourself :-) > > Thanks! > > - Daniel / cpu > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Zhang, Ning <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Should section 7.1.4 list "expired" as a possible status value? Section >> 7.1.6 specifies that an Authorization object may end up in the "expired" >> status. >> >> >> >> By the way, the example in Section 7.1.2.1 has a typo: >> >> >> >> Link: <https://example.com/acme/acct/1/orders?cursor=2>, rel="next" >> >> => >> >> Link: <https://example.com/acme/acct/1/orders?cursor=2>;rel="next" >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Ning >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
