I am also opposed to this change. I think it is a clunky solution and there hasn't been convincing justification of why the base ACME draft needs to carry this complexity instead of having STAR add the extensions it requires.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:27 PM Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <j...@eff.org> wrote: > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/462 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ietf-2Dwg-2Dacme_acme_pull_462&d=DwMCaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=zJkImRuZ93rmhcDQ-zHtt5LOUgwqtl2aszwdEpSC0-w&s=zCXMvIeBxWA73LLbBDMobFZR09mkRMCUrP9bM5v_ylk&e=> > > I'm opposed to this change. It's better for STAR to just extend the Order > object with a new "gettableCert" URL field. Less complex. > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
