You seem to be trying to approach this point-by-point. What Adam and I have been saying is that randomizing everything, you don't have to do the analysis case by case. That's why that's the desired recommendation -- it's conservative.
If you want to do the analysis, go ahead. The URL plan is 100% up to the server operator. But the recommendation in the spec should be the conservative one. --Richard On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 7:49 PM Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <j...@eff.org> wrote: > I'll revise this to include examples from the other URLs. One of my goals > is to switch away from the "counting accounts" or "counting authzs" > examples (which I think we can't effectively mitigate) to more specific > examples of correlations. However, I think I can make that point with > examples from across all the different resource types. > > On 10/09/2018 12:27 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > > Thanks for the PR. > > My only issue is with the changes in there that slim down the example. > ISTM that we should be encouraging unguessable URLs as widely as possible; > guessable URLs should be a justified exception (as you noted in your > description of what LE does). > > If you could slim this down to just killing the "Capability URL" > reference, I would be +1 > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:20 PM Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <j...@eff.org> wrote: > >> On 10/09/2018 11:53 AM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: >> > Also, I would add a caveat that this type of URL design is only >> > necessary for properties that the CA considers secret. For instance, >> > Let's Encrypt does not consider its number of accounts secret, and >> > assigns serially incrementing IDs to account URLs. >> > >> > I'll send a PR later today tweaking this section. >> >> Here's a PR improving the correlations section of security concerns: >> https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/463 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> Acme@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme