A reminder: we need a few more eyes on this draft to move it forward. Deb (and Yoav)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 8:19 PM Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear ACME, > > We need to get some eyes on this draft - draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid. If > you have time, please take a look and let us know whether you think it is > ready (or make comments). We are hoping to get this draft finished! > > Deb Cooley > > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 5:29 PM Sipos, Brian J. <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> All, >> >> I haven’t seen any reviews of the last draft version -09. I hope that the >> closer alignment with RFC 8823 makes its understanding and analysis easier. >> >> >> >> *From:* Acme <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Deb Cooley >> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 24, 2022 7:39 AM >> *To:* IETF ACME <[email protected]>; Brian Sipos <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>; Dorothy E Cooley < >> [email protected]> >> *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.txt >> >> >> >> *APL external email warning: *Verify sender [email protected] before >> clicking links or attachments >> >> >> >> Did we ever get reviews on the updated draft? If not, can we get some >> (or revive the) volunteers? >> >> >> >> Deb Cooley >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 7:12 AM Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It is on the agenda. We will ask for volunteers to review. >> >> >> >> Deb >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 5:29 PM Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> >> >> We’re past IETF LC in terms of document processing and -08 and -09 appear >> to have changed protocol behavior. Since there hasn’t been any discussion >> about this on the mailing list yet, I’d like to ask the WG to review these >> changes ( >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-07&url2=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09). >> Please raise any objections by Friday April 1. >> >> >> >> Helpfully, this document is on the ACME meeting agenda tomorrow at IETF >> 113. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Roman >> >> >> >> *From:* Acme <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Brian Sipos >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2022 11:27 PM >> *To:* IETF ACME <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.txt >> >> >> >> All, >> >> I have posted an update to the Node ID Validation document which updates >> references to now-published DTN RFCs (yay!) and adds algorithm agility for >> the Key Authorization Digest to avoid the validation method being stuck on >> SHA-256. It does add a publication dependency on the COSE hash document, >> but that is in AUTH48 (though it's been stuck in that state for some time >> now). >> >> Comments are welcome and can be discussed at the next IETF. >> >> Brian S. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:35 PM <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Automated Certificate Management >> Environment WG of the IETF. >> >> Title : Automated Certificate Management Environment >> (ACME) Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension >> Author : Brian Sipos >> Filename : draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.txt >> Pages : 31 >> Date : 2022-03-02 >> >> Abstract: >> This document specifies an extension to the Automated Certificate >> Management Environment (ACME) protocol which allows an ACME server to >> validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID for an ACME >> client. The DTN Node ID is encoded as a certificate Subject >> Alternative Name (SAN) of type otherName with a name form of >> BundleEID and as an ACME Identifier type "bundleEID". >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/ >> >> There is also an HTML version available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.html >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09 >> >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org: >> :internet-drafts >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> >>
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
