On 5/11/23 3:52 PM, Antonios Chariton wrote:
What do you think about the naming? Do you perceive “DNS-02” as an improved version, or as a second option? We are happy to rename this to DNS-02 and we have no plans of breaking any ACME server or client already using DNS-01 :)
For the exceedingly little it's worth, I've always thought of those integers as type labels rather than version numbers (I'm not sure that versioning challenges makes that much sense, given how their labels are conveyed by the protocol). Let's say that this is named dns-02, then a problem is discovered with dns-01 that would cause it to be deprecated and a new new dns challenge is rolled out that is substantially similar, but called dns-03. How is that actually a problem? Melinda -- Melinda Shore [email protected] Software longa, hardware brevis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
