Happy New Year!

I'm going through acme's errata.  This one was reported, but crickets on
any responses from the authors (or others).  It looks like a sensible
addition to me, but I'd like confirmation.

Thanks
Deb

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:50 AM RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555,
> "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5861
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: owen friel <[email protected]>
>
> Section: 7.4.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> If a server receives a newAuthz request for an identifier where the
> authorization object already exists, whether created by CA provisioning on
> the ACME server or by the ACME server handling a previous newAuthz request
> from a client, the server returns a 200 (OK) response with the existing
> authorization URL in the Location header field and the existing JSON
> authorization object in the body.
>
> Notes
> -----
> The above text (or similar) should be appended to the end of section 7.4.1
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J. Kasten
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Automated Certificate Management Environment
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to