Thanks. I'll mark this as 'Rejected'. If Owen wants to resubmit it taking this into account, he can.
Deb On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 3:28 PM Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > This overspecifies things. When someone requests to create a new > authorization object (or requests to create a new order object that would > necessitate creation of new authorization objects), it is up to server > policy whether to reuse an existing authorization or not. For instance a > server might have a policy of never reusing authorization objects (that is, > doing validation from scratch every time), or it might have a policy of > reusing only pending authorization objects, or only ones created in the > last N hours or days. > > So I think we should not accept this errata as it stands. >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
