Hi Ulrik!

Il 01/feb/2016 21:12, "Ulrik Sandborg-Petersen" <ulr...@scripturesys.com>
ha scritto:
> first of all, thank you so much for your hard work.  It is appreciated.

BTW: probably it was not clear in my previous e-mail, as I talked only
about the things that I reverted, but I also appreciated your work very
much. You spotted several hidden bugs that I introduced and now, although
we still have a lot of warnings, the code is much more stable.
I hope we will be able to reduce the warnings to almost 0 in the next
future.

> Secondly, I think the proposed changes to the options are good, so from
me it is a "go ahead" on the options.

Perfect.
@Tiago: any opinion?

> Thirdly, I will try to make time for a code review of your changes, which
might ferret out some bugs, so don't worry about that either.

That would be great!

> In conclusion: From me, it is a "please go ahead".

Cheers!
Giulio

>
> On 01/02/16 22:07, Giulio Paci wrote:
>>
>> Hi to all,
>>    I am proceeding with my work trying to update acopost codebase.
>> I now have several commits that I would like to push, but I think we
should agree on some of them before I proceed.
>>
>> I have completed the work about readline replacement, so now there are
just a few other functions that should be replaced with re-entrant
alternatives (e.g.: strtok, lowercase, tokenizer, ...).
>>
>> In the meanwhile I started rewriting option handling. I wrote a module
that has been inspired by the glib one for option handling, that improves
readability very much. However this module enforces some common practice
that introduces some incompatibilities (in particular it forces options to
appear before file names) and I introduced some others in order to make the
command lines interfaces more uniform: all commands should respect -h
(help) and -v (verbosity level), when dictionary is needed -d should be
used, -o is used for operation mode, accepting integers or names, always
with the same meaning across binaries.
>> I think the benefits of a common interface are better then perfect
backward compatibility. However, before pushing it and before completing my
job (met is still not updated, documentation is not updated as well), I
would like to know if you think this work is useful or if you consider this
change too intrusive.
>>
>> I modified met so that now it uses malloced arrays (and do not crash
anymore with my PC). Unfortunately it is very slow. I do not know if this
was expected or if it is due to my changes.
>> I have made so many changes that I likely introduced several bugs.
>>
>> I also tried to compile a list of my desiderata in a TODO file. I guess
we could also add other items to that list (e.g.: make the tagger more
generic).
>>
>> What do you think about it? May I proceed?
>>
>> Bests,
>> Giulio.
>>
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
>> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
>> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
>> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> acopost-devel mailing list
>> acopost-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acopost-devel
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> acopost-devel mailing list
> acopost-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acopost-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
acopost-devel mailing list
acopost-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acopost-devel

Reply via email to