http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6556

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |acpi-
                   |                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                   |                            |et
            Summary|ACPI didn't wake up second  |CPU #1 not responding -
                   |CPU( AMD 64 x2, ATI rd480   |cannot use it. - AMD 64 x2,
                   |chipset)                    |ATI rd480 chipset



------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-18 00:07 -------
The CPU detection and startup sequence should be exactly the same
with and without "acpi=ht", so I don't understand why that fails
in the default and "acpi=ht" succeeds.
If you try it multiple times, does it
always succeed with "acpi=ht" and always fails without?

please disable the timestamps in your dmesg, and then attach (do not paste)
the complete dmesg -s64000 output from the failure case, and all the
success cases you can come up with.  Maybe when i diff these files
I'll see something I missed in the pasted text below.

Also, please attach the output from acpidump, available in the latest
pmtools here:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/


------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to